Electrical energy Meter Tampering: Retired Colonel’s Electrical energy Meter Tampering Case: Discom Refunds Superb Nearest 7 Years | Gurgaon Information newsfragment

Gurgaon: Seven years later a retired colonel used to be accused of tampering along with his electrical energy meter and imposed a Rs 5 lakh penalty, the Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam refunded the sum with 24% annual hobby later the discom did not handover evidence of energy robbery sooner than an area courtroom.
Balram Singh, now 72, within the interim, fought the case in 3 courts.Regardless of a beneficial verdict every era, it used to be no longer sooner than November 22 that DHBVN deposited the sum sooner than the civil pass judgement on.
In step with Singh’s recommend, Sandeep Mehta, in November 2016 a couple of DHBVN officers, who didn’t have any figuring out evidence on them, inspected an electrical energy meter at Singh’s South Town 2 place of dwelling. The boys made Singh’s spouse signal a unoccupied paper — they claimed it used to be an acknowledgement receipt of the inspection, a regimen affair — and stated the main points from the audit can be crammed in next.
When she used to be passed over a novel of the inspection file, it stated they had been tampering with the meter and stealing energy. “Singh approached the DHBVN and was asked to deposit the assessment sum of Rs 4.6 lakh and a compounding interest of Rs 40,000 to resume connection,” Mehta stated.
Singh paid part of the sum and filed a case within the civil courtroom claiming the electrical energy meter used to be put in out of doors his space and checked via a DHBVN meter reader each two months and refuse tampering or glitch used to be flagged until next. “The meter was installed outside the premises of the consumer, so the electricity department is accountable and responsible for meter’s malfunction,” stated Mehta.
On August 22, 2022, civil pass judgement on (teenage section) Himani Gill directed DHBVN to refund the volume with the hobby to Singh however the discom challenged the layout sooner than the consultation courtroom.
Alternative consultation pass judgement on Rajesh Sharma, in his layout dated August 31, 2023, guarded the decrease courtroom layout. The courtroom noticed that refuse proof used to be accumulated via DHBVN to end up that electrical energy robbery used to be being dedicated via the petitioner nor used to be the intake development of the shopper tested.
“Technical glitch may occur in an electricity meter thereby slowing it down. In such circumstances, it will not always be a case of tampering and it was incumbent and obligatory on (the) discom to corroborate the lab report (of the meter) by adducing on record certain documents in the shape of electricity bills of the previous period as also after installation of the new meter, which would reflect the consumption pattern of electricity by the consumer,” the courtroom noticed. The petitioner filed an execution petition as DHBVN did not reimburse the penalty in spite of the consultation courtroom layout.
Civil pass judgement on (teenage section) Vijay Kadyan in his layout on October 30 directed DHBVN to refund the volume deposited via the petitioner together with the hobby. The petitioner filed every other attraction sooner than the courtroom and after all in November, with the intervention of the courtroom, DHBVN deposited a cheque sooner than the courtroom of civil pass judgement on (teenage section) Himani Gill on November 22.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *